Legal Opinion
Stanton v. RICH BAKER BERMAN & CO., PA
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 30, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-2619 (AJL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action by pro se plaintiff Robert N. Stanton (“Stanton”) against defendants Rich Baker Berman & Co., P.A. (“RBB”), Rosenberg Druker & Company, P.A. (“RD”), RD/RBB Certified Public Accountants, P.A. (“RD/RBB”), Alvin P. Levine (“Levine”), Barry D. Kopp (“Kopp”), Nicholas Truglio (“Truglio”), Frank S. LaForgia (“LaForgia”), Kalman A. Barson (“Barson”), Aaron A. Rich (“Rich”), Howard Baker (“Baker”) and Kenneth A. Berman (“Berman”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) for recovery of fees under two finder’s agreements. The legal theories pursuant to which…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Cendant Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- In Re Route One West Windsor Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Seidenberg v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998