Legal Opinion

In Re Malanga

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 25, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

2Per curiam

The Essex County Ethics Committee filed a presentment in which it found that the respondent, Michael L. Malanga, violated Canon 11 of the Canons of Professional Ethics by appropriating to his own use and failing to promptly account for funds belonging to his client.

The facts, as developed at hearings before the Committee, fully substantiate its findings. The complainant, John J. Erla, retained the respondent in January 1962, to press a claim for damages arising from an automobile collision in which he had suffered physical injury and property damage.…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re GavelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. In Re BaronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. In Re BannerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. In Re SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API