Legal Opinion

In Re Stern

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 4, 1983PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

After considering three complaints against respondent, the District IY Ethics Committee for Camden and Gloucester Counties issued a presentment. The Disciplinary Review Board (Board) agreed that respondent had engaged in unethical conduct. After a hearing, the Board recommended that respondent be suspended for a period of three years; that his readmission be conditioned upon successful completion of a Skills and Methods training course or similar courses concerning legal ethics, legal accounting and New Jersey practice; and that his readmission be limited to practice with a law firm in which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. In Re GavelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. In Re ZdericWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Matter of GetchiusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. In Re BarrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of TempletonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Matter of HeinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Matter of GoldsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. In re StranskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  5. St. Cloud National Bank & Trust Co. v. BrutgerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API