Legal Opinion
Carline v. Capital Marine Supply, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 1, 1979No. Civ. A. No. 77-3422PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REASONS FOR RULING
CHARLES SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Manuel Carline, filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction, seeking to compel defendant, Capital Marine Supply, Inc. to pay maintenance and cure to him at a rate in excess of $8.00 per day, the rate at which defendant is presently paying maintenance and cure. Following oral argument on the motion, the court denied in-junctive relief and now assigns these reasons for ruling.
Plaintiff has proposed several alternative bases for determining the proper amount of maintenance and cure to be paid, including the rate set by various union…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hudspeth v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
- Robinson v. Plimsoll Marine, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978
- United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Duplantis v. Williams-McWilliams Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richard Tate v. American Tugs, Inc. And Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., Helix Subsea Construction, Inc., and Helix Well Ops Inc. v. Matthew Howard, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. RigbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012