Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Rigby
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentShepherd, J.
This is an appeal of an order requiring Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. to pay a seaman indefinite maintenance benefits of twenty-five dollars per day and the cost of rehabilitation, based upon a request made, without supporting evidence, during a motion calendar. The majority opines that because it failed to appeal a prior interlocutory injunction, also obtained without supporting evidence, requiring it to provide the seaman with temporary housing in Miami, Royal Caribbean is barred from challenging the current order. Because the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure authorize but do not compel…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Vella v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Operation Rescue v. Women's Health CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Richard Tate v. American Tugs, Inc. And Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Bettez v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.