Legal Opinion

McLennan v. McDermid

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Mackinac. (Steere, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This suit was brought to recover tor piles and other timber furnished by plaintiff to defendants for a railroad dock which defendants were to construct at St. *381Ignace. The declaration contains counts on written contracts for the delivery of timber, and also the common counts. The first written contract, omitting the attached bill, is as follows:

“ Agreement made this 20th day of October, 1881, between Alexander McLennan, of the first part, and McDermid & Hendrie, of the second part.

Whereas the said party of the first part agrees to deliver on the cars of the D., M. & M. Ry., in the vicinity of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Way v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Fraser v. Collier Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. McDonald v. OrtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. McLennan v. McDermidMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API