Legal Opinion
Padmanabhan v. Hulka
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 3, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17–11939–NMGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGorton, J.
This case arises from the termination of the employment of Dr. Bharanidharan Padmanabhan ("plaintiff" or "Padmanabhan" or "Dr. Bharani") and his subsequent sanctioning by the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine ("BORIM" or "the Board"). It is not the first lawsuit brought by the doctor in connection with these events. In this case, plaintiff brings a plethora of claims against multiple defendants. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that defendants 1) violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), 2) conspired to violate RICO, 18 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- J. Cory Cordova, M.D. v. Lafayette General Health, Inc., University Hospitals & Clinics, Lafayette General Medical Center,inc., and Karen Curry, M.D.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
- McMillan v. Rodriguez-NegronDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020
- Teal v. Bristol West Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024