Legal Opinion

Auto Club Ins. Ass'n v. Frederick & Herrud, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1985No. Docket 79289PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C.J.

Defendant appeals as of right from the order of summary judgment entered on June 25, 1984, declaring that plaintiff and defendant were equally responsible for the payment of no-fault benefits to their respective insureds. Plaintiff cross-appeals.

On August 25, 1982, plaintiff brought suit against defendant, alleging that seven named insureds were each insured under a no-fault insurance contract issued by it, which contracts contained "coordination-of-benefits” clauses. Plaintiff was obligated to pay medical benefits for injuries resulting from auto accidents involving the insureds unless the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. H. MANN INS. CO.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Nyquist v. Aetna InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Siller v. Employers Insurance of WausauMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Federal Kemper Insurance v. Health Insurance Administration, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Auto Club Insurance v. Frederick & Herrud, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lewis v. TRANSAMERICA INS. CORPORATION OF AMERICAMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n v. Mutual Sav. and Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  5. Kiefer v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API