Legal Opinion

The Bank of the United States v. Jacob White, David Cummins, and Robert Bennefil

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1834PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

33 U.S. 262

8 Pet. 262

8 L.Ed. 938

THE BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS

v.

JACOB WHITE, DAVID CUMMINS, AND ROBERT BENNEFIL.

January Term, 1834

APPEAL from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Ohio.

The case, as stated by Mr Justice STORY, was as follows.

1

The Bank of the United States, in 1826, brought a bill in equity against the appellees, and Hugh Glenn, James Glenn and Thomas Graham. The object of the bill was to set aside certain conveyances of real estate, made by the appellee, White, to the other appellees, Cummins and Bennefil, upon which estates the bank, as…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Story.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Gabrielle Brockenbrough, John Harvie, Edwin Harvie, Jacqueline Harvie, Julia Ann Harvie, Heirs at Law, and Devisees of John HarvieSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Abner L. Duncan's Heirs & Representatives v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  3. Bank of the United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1834

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ronald Couch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  2. Forbes v. TuckermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Hann v. Venetian Blind CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
  4. Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. v. KeithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API