Legal Opinion
Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 7, 1932No. 5PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
This suit was commenced by John H. Woodbury and the John H. Woodbury Laboratories, Inc., to restrain an infringement of trade-mark and recover damages for violation thereof. A counterclaim was interposed. On September 19, 1929, appellees applied for the discharge of the appellants as their attorneys. After hearings, the District Judge referred the matter to a special master with the direction that, “If after the Special Master reports on that issue, this Court holds that the case was abandoned by the said attorneys, without cause, further proceedings will bo…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. CaubleSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Concord Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- McDonald v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Mulholland v. KernsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Laughlin v. ClephaneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.