Legal Opinion

Grant v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1988No. 87-914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Associate Judge:

In this appeal we must decide whether the District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals (OEA) abused its discretion in terminating for cause an employee in the Career Service after it found that the employee had threatened others with bodily harm and was carrying a knife, and OEA determined that the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (DOES) had properly made an exception to the thirty-day notice period for an adverse action because the employee constituted an “immediate hazard” to the workplace. We find no abuse of discretion or error in OEA’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dell v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Hughes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Kegley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Nova University v. Educational Institution Licensure CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Gunty v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Hun Kim Lim v. District of Columbia Taxicab CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. State v. CampfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Lim v. TAXICAB COM'NDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API