Legal Opinion
Lim v. TAXICAB COM'N
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 22, 1989No. 87-1122PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
564 A.2d 720 (1989)
Hun Kim LIM, Petitioner,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TAXICAB COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 87-1122.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued March 21, 1989.
Decided September 22, 1989.
Lawrence D. Levien, with whom Dawn E. Starr and Julie A. Boesky, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner.
Martin B. White, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Frederick D. Cooke, Jr., Corp. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, and Lutz Alexander Prager, Asst. Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent.
Before NEWMAN and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Nova University v. Educational Institution Licensure CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Don't Tear It Down, Inc. v. D. C. Department of Housing & Community DevelopmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Martin v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dial a Car, Inc. v. Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998