Legal Opinion

Brody v. Save Way Northern Boulevard, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.

Defendant, Save Way Northern Boulevard, Inc., moves for an order pursuant to rule 113 of the B-ules of Civil Practice, granting said defendant summary judgment dismissing the complaint herein, upon the ground that there is no dispute as to the material facts, and that as a matter of law plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed.

The sole real issue herein is whether a violation of a penal ordinance regulating signs at gasoline stations enacted to protect the public against misleading price advertising and conferring no civil right or remedy expressed therein can form the basis for a damage…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Good Humor Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. People v. Arlen Service Stations, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. People Ex Rel. Moskowitz v. . JenkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Lang v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coley v. Arnot Ogden Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Goldstein v. ManganoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
  3. Caso v. GotbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API