Legal Opinion

Reinhold v. Fee Fee Trunk Sewer, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1984No. 46121PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Special Judge.

Plaintiffs, who are owners and managers of real property, appeal the dismissal of their petition for a class action seeking to recover certain assets, “contributions in aid of construction,” totaling $1 million paid by them to a privately owned utility, Fee Fee Trunk Sewer, Inc., (Fee Fee) when Fee Fee sold its assets to the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (M.S.D.), a municipal corporation. M.S.D. continued to provide existing sewer service. These contributions arise when a housing developer puts in sewers, deeds them to the sewer company without…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Shapiro v. Columbia Union National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. May Department Stores Co. v. Union E.L. P. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Concerned Parents v. Caruthersville School District 18Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  5. Straube v. Bowling Green Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Craft v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Murat v. F/V SHELIKOF STRAITAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Grudzina v. New Mexico Youth Diagnostic & Development CenterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Helton Const. Co., Inc. v. ThriftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API