Gordon v. Beck & Gregg Hardware Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
(After the above statement of facts.) We do not think that the petition showed that no contract of sale was made because there was no unconditional acceptance of the defendant’s order; or that the petition showed that the suit was barred by the statute of frauds. These two contentions will be treated together. All of the correspondence between the parties must be considered. Briefly, it appears therefrom that the plaintiff wrote the defendant offering to sell the two kinds of gymnasiums subsequently ordered by the defendant, one at $12.75 each and the other at $13.40 each, and shortly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- North & Co. v. Mendel & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Erwin v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Capital City Brick Co. v. Atlanta Ice & Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Turner v. Lorillard Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Rowland Co. v. Kell Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oklejas v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Houston v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Industrial Welding & Tool Supplies, Inc. v. CIT Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Hoc, Inc. v. McAllisterDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
- HOC, Inc. v. McAllister (In re McAllister)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.