Legal Opinion

Rowland Co. v. Kell Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 6, 1921No. 12053PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Action on contract; from Clarke superior court — Judge Cobb. October 26, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The suit as originally brought was for damages for an alleged breach by the vendee of a contract of purchase. The seller, proceeding under section 4131 of the Civil Code (1910), asked for damages under the 'first method of procedure as prescribed by that section, for the amount of the difference between the contract.price and the market price of the goods at the time and place for delivery. The evidence disclosed that after the alleged breach by the vendee, the seller had not in fact adopted this method of determining the amount of his damages, but had pursued for this purpose the second mode…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Harris v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Maxwell v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  5. Water, Light & Gas Co. v. City of HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City Council v. LamarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Harrell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. East Side Lumber & Coal Co. v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Floyd v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API