Legal Opinion

Kronfeld, Saunders & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 14, 1914No. 1246PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 33227 (T. D. 33668).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The importations involved in this case consist of paintings in ordinary gilded wooden frames. Some of the paintings were assessed at 15 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 470 of the act of 1909 and the others were passed free of duty under paragraph 717, but in both instances the frames were separately assessed by the collector at 35 per cent ad valorem as manufactures of wood under paragraph 215. The appellant contends that where the paintings are dutiable the frames are dutiable at the same rate as part of the value of the paintings, and that where paintings are free the frames are also…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robertson v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Allen v. GilletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Oberteuffer v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. United States v. Ranlett & StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. United States v. WaterhouseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arnart Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  4. Protest 997040-G/11758 of American Import Co.United States Customs Court · 1940
  5. R. J. Godwin's Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API