Legal Opinion
Card v. Pipes
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 1, 2004No. 03-6327HOPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOGAN, District Judge.
Defendants removed this action from the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Lane County. The amended complaint alleges claims for defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). Defendants move to dismiss the amended complaint on grounds that plaintiff has not effected proper service and the amended complaint fails to state a claim. Defendants also move to strike the amended complaint pursuant to Oregon’s anti-strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) statute, Or.Rev.Stat. § 30.142 et seq.
Background
Plaintiff is a professor of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States Of America, Ex El., Plaintiff v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Gennifer Flowers v. James Carville Hillary Rodham Clinton Little, Brown & Co. George StephanopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. IMG Worldwide, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Cagle v. SattlerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Dossett v. Ho-Chunk, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Eugene Fedoseev and Oksana Baranchuk v. Tempus Logix and Open Road TruckingDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- Evans v. Crowe & Mulvey, LLPDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.