Legal Opinion

In the Interest of R.J.T.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2010PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

This case comes before this Court as a Children’s Fast Track matter involving the potential change of the goal of a dependent child’s permanency plan from reunification with his parents to adoption. We granted review to consider whether the Superior Court erred in determining that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the goal change requested by the Allegheny County Office of Children, Youth, and Families (“CYF”). Upon review, we conclude that the Superior Court erred. Accordingly, we reverse the Superior Court’s decision and reinstate the trial court’s order.

On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jaiguay v. VasquezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Cady v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. In Re Adoption of S.E.G.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. In the Interest of D.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. In the Interest of R.J.T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. In re T.S.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. In re Adoption of S.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. In the Interest of A.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. In re R.I.S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API