Legal Opinion

Morris v. Huber

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1933No. 1184PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The trial court was of the opinion that the plaintiff had failed to introduce any competent evidence of damages and this being an essential element in the case nothing remained for the jury to consider.

We think the court was in error in thus directing a verdict for defendant.

We quote from the First National Bank of Barnesville v Western Union Tel. Co., 30 Oh St, 555, first syllabus:

“In case of a breach of contract, actual damages not being proved, nominal damages may be recovered.”

Also at page 568 of the opinion:

“But the plaintiff was entitled to recover nominal damages.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Candee v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Parks v. Alta Cal. Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Detroit & Ironton Rd. Co. v. VogeleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Smith v. PadgettOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. City of Cincinnati v. BanksOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Williams v. Allied Automotive, Autolite DivisionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
  5. In re Appropriation of Property of EllisOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API