Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Banks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 2001No. Appeal No. C-000039, Trial No. A-9806725PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shannon, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant the city of Cincinnati appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding defendant-appellee Cheryl Banks $4,469,760 for the city’s appropriation of her property. The city advances on appeal six assignments of error that, in essence, challenge the trial court’s exercise of its discretion with respect to the evidence permitted to be adduced and the comments permitted to be offered in argument before the jury. Finding no merit to any aspect of these challenges, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The genesis of this appeal was the city’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Pang v. MinchOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Rigby v. Lake CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ohio Environmental Development Ltd. Partnership v. Envirotest Systems Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  2. Glass City Academy, Inc. v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Knowlton v. SchultzOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Cincinnati v. Triton Servs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API