Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Utah Board of Oil, Gas & Mining
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 2008No. 20070410PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
PARRISH, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
T 1 In 2006, Christopher M. Sullivan filed a request for agency action with the Utah Board of Oil, Gas and Mining (the "Board"). Sullivan claimed to be legally entitled to a share of the proceeds from sixteen oil and gas wells owned and operated by Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore, LP ("KMG"). We are asked to determine whether the Board properly denied Sullivan's request for agency action. Sullivan argues that the Board erred by (1) dismissing his request without a hearing on the merits, (2) refusing to continue the matter pending the outcome of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown & Root Industrial Service v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- Housing Authority, County of Salt Lake v. SnyderUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Alamo National Bank of San Antonio v. HurdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Gardner v. BD. OF CTY. COM. OF WASATCH CTY.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
- Pease v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Utah Resources International, Inc. v. Mark Technologies Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2014
- Kunej v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. Jordan River Res.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
- Wintle-Butts v. Career Service Review OfficeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.