State v. Cromwell
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.
' The state’s attorney of Mercer county filed an Information in the district court of that county charging the defendant Cromwell with the offense of attempting to practice photography without a license, contrary to the provisions of chap. 188, Session Laws 1939. This Information charged: “. . . said defendant then being in the act of taking and producing, for compensation, through the sale thereof, images on sensitized material by the action of light, and with the use of a camera, said defendant having in his possession at said time, a camera with said sensitized materials, which said…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Johnson v. HassettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Santa Barbara v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Matter of Adoption of KASNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.