Fisher Scientific Co. v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Fisher Scientific Company (“Fisher”) seeks to enjoin defendants, the City of New York, the New York City Council (“City Council”), the City Council’s Committee on Civil Service and Labor (the “Committee”) and the members of the City Council (collectively, the “City Defendants”), from holding a hearing on or proposing, endorsing, or ratifying Resolution 910. Resolution 910 expresses a negative opinion about Fisher’s labor negotiations with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Steel, Metal, Alloys and Hardware Fabricators…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wali v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mastrovincenzo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Legal Aid Society v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Alameda Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Oakland, Northern California Newspaper Guild, Local 52, Newspaper Guild, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Mastrovincenzo v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006