Alameda Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Oakland, Northern California Newspaper Guild, Local 52, Newspaper Guild, Intervenor-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Today we decide whether preemption law compels a City, against its wishes, to patronize a newspaper company embroiled in a bitter and divisive labor dispute with its employees. Our answer is that it does not. Specifically, we hold that the City of Oakland may determine as a matter of principle not to do business with Alameda Newspapers, Inc. during the course of a labor boycott, and that the City Council may suggest that the residents of Oakland do likewise. Although a City cannot regulate in an area governed by federal labor law or that Congress intended to be…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Legal Aid Society v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 57 v. Sage Hospitality Resources, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Air Transport Ass'n of America v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
- Pritikin v. Department Of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Michiko Gingery v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.