Legal Opinion

Alameda Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Oakland, Northern California Newspaper Guild, Local 52, Newspaper Guild, Intervenor-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 13, 1996No. 94-16513PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Today we decide whether preemption law compels a City, against its wishes, to patronize a newspaper company embroiled in a bitter and divisive labor dispute with its employees. Our answer is that it does not. Specifically, we hold that the City of Oakland may determine as a matter of principle not to do business with Alameda Newspapers, Inc. during the course of a labor boycott, and that the City Council may suggest that the residents of Oakland do likewise. Although a City cannot regulate in an area governed by federal labor law or that Congress intended to be…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Legal Aid Society v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 57 v. Sage Hospitality Resources, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Air Transport Ass'n of America v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
  4. Pritikin v. Department Of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Michiko Gingery v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API