Legal Opinion
Mastrovincenzo v. City Of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 5, 2006No. 78PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
435 F.3d 78
Christopher MASTROVINCENZO a/k/a Mastro and Kevin Santos a/k/a Nak or Nac, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor, Gretchen Dykstra, Commissioner of Consumer Affairs, New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, Defendants-Appellants.
Docket No. 04-2264-CV.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued: January 10, 2005.
Decided: January 5, 2006.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Deborah A. Brenner (Barry P. Schwartz, of counsel; Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, on the brief), New York,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ritell v. Village of Briarcliff ManorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006