Legal Opinion

Laurence Davis v. Norman M. Littell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 15, 1968No. 21578_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

The question presented by this appeal is whether appellee, by virtue of his position as general counsel for the Navajo Tribe, was entitled to assert absolute privilege as to defamatory statements made by him within the scope of his official duties.

Suit was brought by appellant in the District Court for the District of Arizona, with jurisdiction founded on diversity of citizenship. Both parties are non-Indians who were employed by the Navajo Tribe at the time of the alleged defamation: appellee as general counsel, appellant as his assistant. Appellant alleges that due to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  5. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. White Mountain Apache Indian Tribe v. ShelleyArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Acres Bonusing, Inc v. Lester MarstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Spotted Eagle v. BLACKFEET TRIBE OF BLACKFEET INDIAN RES., CITY OF BROWNINGDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API