Legal Opinion
White Mountain Apache Indian Tribe v. Shelley
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1971No. 10216PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Vice Chief Justice.
Respondent, Frank Magini, entered into a road construction contract with the Fort Apache Timber Company (hereinafter referred to as FATCO). Alleging that FATCO had breached the contract, respondent filed suit in the Navajo County Superior Court. In addition to FATCO, respondent named petitioners Barry DeRose and Hal Butler as parties to the suit. Petitioner DeRose is general counsel for the White Mountain Apache Indian Tribe (hereinafter referred to as TRIBE) and FATCO, while petitioner Butler is general manager of FATCO.
In the court below, respondent judge ruled that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Atkinson v. HaldaneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Dixon v. Picopa Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Richard D. Greene and Donna J. Greene, Husband and Wife, Debtors, Ross Richardson, Chapter 7, Trustee-Appellee v. Mt. Adams FurnitureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.