Legal Opinion

Questar Exploration & Production Co. v. Woodard Villa, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 7, 2013No. 48,401-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

|TThe lessors, Woodard Villa Inc. and its principal, Ernest Scott Woodard (collectively, “Woodard”), appeal a summary judgment declaring that the entirety of their mineral lease was maintained, at Haynesville Shale depth, by a well drilled by the working interest owner, Questar Exploration & Production (“QEP”), when the well was drilled off the lease premises and on land not unitized with the lease premises, but the well’s horizontal shaft entered the Haynesville Shale formation under the lease premises. For the reasons expressed, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

On August 5, 2004,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  2. Hunter Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  3. Odom v. Union Producing CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  4. Caskey v. Kelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  5. Broussard v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alford v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
  2. Amber, LLC v. Welsh Oil Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Triple C Minerals, LLC v. XTO Energy, Inc., ET AL.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API