Odom v. Union Producing Company
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Justice.
This action was brought for the cancellation of an oil, gas, and mineral lease covering certain described lands in Sections Thirty-Two and Thirty-Three, Township Twenty-Three North, Range Six West, Claiborne Parish. From a judgment of the trial court rejecting their demands at their costs, plaintiffs appealed to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit; they acquiesced in that part of the judgment of the trial court affecting Section Thirty-Three, but *51they pursued their appeal with respect to Section Thirty-Two. The Court of Appeal ordered the cancellation of the lease, insofar as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Reagan v. MurphySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Le Blanc v. Danciger Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Robbert v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United StatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Childs v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Frey v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Rebstock v. Birthright Oil & Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Frederick J. Frey v. Amoco Production CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- St. Romain v. Midas Exploration, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Stephenson v. Petrohawk Properties, L.P.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.