Legal Opinion

Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 28, 2013No. Nos. 2012-C-2292, 2012-C-2377PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOLL, Justice.*

1 ,This mineral rights case presents seminal issues concerning our civilian doctrine *796of error and the reformation of written contracts for errors vitiating consent. It arises out of an extension of a three-year primary term oil and gas lease, covering 1805.34 acres in the southern part of Cad-do Parish, to four and one-half years. Plaintiffs, Cynthia Fry Peironnet (“Peiron-net”), Elizabeth Fry Franklin (“Franklin”), and Eleanor Baugnies de St. Marceaux (“Marceaux”), sued the lessee, Matador Resources Company (“Matador”), to rescind or reform the extension agreement making it…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  4. Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Chanler v. Jamestown Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Semco, LLC v. Grand Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Bank of Am., N.A. v. GreenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. B A Kelly Land v. Aethon EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  5. Marioneaux v. MarioneauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API