Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
KNOLL, Justice.*
1 ,This mineral rights case presents seminal issues concerning our civilian doctrine *796of error and the reformation of written contracts for errors vitiating consent. It arises out of an extension of a three-year primary term oil and gas lease, covering 1805.34 acres in the southern part of Cad-do Parish, to four and one-half years. Plaintiffs, Cynthia Fry Peironnet (“Peiron-net”), Elizabeth Fry Franklin (“Franklin”), and Eleanor Baugnies de St. Marceaux (“Marceaux”), sued the lessee, Matador Resources Company (“Matador”), to rescind or reform the extension agreement making it…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Chanler v. Jamestown Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Semco, LLC v. Grand Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Bank of Am., N.A. v. GreenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- B A Kelly Land v. Aethon EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- Marioneaux v. MarioneauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.