Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Water District v. Heilbron

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1959No. Civ. No. 23581PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATROSSO, J. pro tem.*

This is an original proceeding in mandate instituted by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, hereinafter referred to as the ‘1 district, ’ ’ against the respondent, the secretary of its board of directors, to compel the latter to publish a notice inviting proposals for an issue of $26,400,000 waterworks bonds, series 4, authorized by an ordinance and a resolution adopted by the district’s board of directors. The respondent has made return by general demurrer.

The district is a public corporation organized under the statute known as the “Metropolitan…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Epping v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Carlson v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. City of Oxnard v. DaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. O'Rear v. SartainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CHARTIER REAL ESTATE COMPANY v. ChafeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  2. City of Saratoga v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Bd. of Educ. of County of Hancock v. SlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API