Metropolitan Water District v. Heilbron
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PATROSSO, J. pro tem.*
This is an original proceeding in mandate instituted by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, hereinafter referred to as the ‘1 district, ’ ’ against the respondent, the secretary of its board of directors, to compel the latter to publish a notice inviting proposals for an issue of $26,400,000 waterworks bonds, series 4, authorized by an ordinance and a resolution adopted by the district’s board of directors. The respondent has made return by general demurrer.
The district is a public corporation organized under the statute known as the “Metropolitan…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Epping v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Carlson v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Oxnard v. DaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- O'Rear v. SartainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CHARTIER REAL ESTATE COMPANY v. ChafeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
- City of Saratoga v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Bd. of Educ. of County of Hancock v. SlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985