Legal Opinion

Bickford's, Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 23, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTÉRSON, District Judge.

The suit is to impress a trust upon the proceeds of certain cheeks collected by the defendant Federal Reserve Bank. The bill alleges that the plaintiff deposited cheeks drawn on other banks with the Bank of United States shortly before it was closed, to be collected and credited to its account with that bank, and that other depositors likewise deposited cheeks for collection; that the Bank of United States sent the eheeks to the Federal Reserve Bank to be collected, with the result that, when the former hank was closed on December 11, 1930, the Federal Reserve Bank…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. CaubleSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Smith v. SwormstedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Stewart v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Riverland Levee Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. Willcox v. Harriman Securities CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1933
  3. Speed v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  4. Shain v. Armour & Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  5. McIntyre v. DowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API