Legal Opinion
Hall v. Bunn
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 1984No. 83-961PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.
In reversing the judgment below, the court of appeals held that a pretrial motion in limine is not a proper vehicle for making a final determination as to the admissibility of evidence. In their briefs the parties also advanced arguments concerning this point.
Upon reviewing the record before us, however, we are compelled to conclude that this particular issue need not be addressed. Rather, this case must be resolved within the context of Civ. R. 15(B).
Civ. R. 15(B) concerns the amendment of pleadings to conform to the evidence, and states:
“When issues not raised by the pleadings are tried by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hardin v. Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- State ex rel. Evans v. Bainbridge Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Thomas v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Robbins v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Hodgson v. Colonnades, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Bank of New York v. BrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Spisak v. McDoleOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Mahan v. Bethesda Hospital, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Whitmer v. ZochowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.