Legal Opinion

Heffner by Heffner v. Schad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 1984No. 940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

Plaintiffs-appellants, Andrew Heffner and his mother, Mary Susan Heffner, appeal the trial court’s denial of their motions for judgment N.O.V. and for a new trial which followed a jury verdict in favor of defendant, Robert G. Schad, appellee herein. Appellants, alleging that appellee’s behavior in striking Andrew Heffner with his car, was negligent, contend that the court should have directed a verdict in their favor. Alternatively, they argue that they should be granted a new trial because of various alleged court errors. We have considered appellants’ allegations in light of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. MelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Farley v. VentrescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. McElroy v. ROZZISuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Boor v. SchreiberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Litman v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Northwest Savings Ass'n v. DistlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Cooke v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Cannon v. TaborSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Hyatt v. County of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Sawczuk-Serge v. Township of CheltenhamCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API