Legal Opinion

Autrey v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 14, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStrum, J.

Upon an indictment charging the offense of rape, plaintiff in error, who will hereinafter be referred to as the defendant, was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape, and has taken writ or error to the judgment of conviction.

The principal point relied on for reversal is the question of identity of the defendant.

The prosecutrix testified at the trial, but was not asked by the State to identify the defendant as the person committing the assault, a circumstance diligently stressed by the defendant upon this writ of error in his argument upon the question of the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. People v. AmayaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Warren v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. State v. LovellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. Phillips v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Spivey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. Albano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API