Legal Opinion
Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 12, 2004No. 03-1141PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
Federal law makes it a crime to engage in collective bargaining over the terms or conditions of military service on behalf of members of the National Guard who are serving on full-time National Guard duty. Relying on that law, 10 U.S.C. § 976 (2000), the Federal Labor Relations Authority declined to order the Guard to bargain over a union proposal concerning military training duties assigned to Na*283tional Guard technicians who serve as both civilian employees and military members of the Guard. Because the union’s proposal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Campos-SerranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Assn Civ Tech PR v. FLRACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Assn Civ Tech v. FLRACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004