Legal Opinion
Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 7, 2000No. 99-1476PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:
“The National Guard has the dual mission of serving both the state in which the Guard unit is located and the federal government. The Guard stands ready to preserve peace and order at the command of state authorities; and to provide combat-ready units and to control domestic violence at the President’s discretion. See Perpich v. Department of Defense, 496 U.S. 334, 110 S.Ct. 2418, 110 L.Ed.2d 312 (1990). Because the National Guard is not a full-time active force, it employs civilian ‘technicians’ to perform…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fort Stewart Schools v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Perpich v. Department of DefenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- New York Council, Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 2953 v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- United States Department of the Navy, Naval Aviation Depot, Cherry Point, North Carolina v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Lipscomb v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Lipscomb v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
- Assn Civ Tech TX v. FLRACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.