Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Federal Express Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 10, 2015No. Case No. 14-cv-01082-TEHPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Parties’, motions for summary judgment. After carefully considering the Parties’ written- and oral arguments, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motions for summary judgment, as set forth below.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Robert Gardner was a full-time Ramp Transport Driver (RTD) at the Oakland yard facility of Defendant Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”) when he suffered an on-the-job injury to his neck and shoulder on January 30,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Demetrio Mejia v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Hummel v. Maricopa County Adult Probation DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  3. Jaco v. WinCo Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Yphantides v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API