Legal Opinion
Hummel v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 1, 2020No. 2:16-cv-04381Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Nannette G. Hummel, No. CV-16-04381-PHX-JJT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, 13 Defendant. 14 15 This Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) case comes back to this Court on 16 remand from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which issued a memorandum reversing 17 this Court’s decision granting Defendant Maricopa County Adult Probation Department’s 18 (“APD”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (See Docs. 61, 58.) Upon remand, the Court finds 19 the Plaintiff Nannette Hummel…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.