Legal Opinion
Application of Miller
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 28, 1952No. Patent Appeal 5888PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims, Nos. 1 to 5, inclusive, in appellant’s application for a patent on an alleged invention consisting of an improvement in a sensitized photographic -element or article adapted for use in the art of color photography.
The references are: Murray et al. 2,140,-847 Dec. 20, 1938; Murray et al. 2,159,600 May 23, 1939; Sanders-Dolgoruki 2,163,325 June 20, 1939; Wilmanns et al. 2,224,329 Dec. 10, 1940.
Claim 1 is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Lawther v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Blanchard v. OomsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Hardinge Bros. v. Marr Oil Heat Mach. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- In re AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
3Cited by3 opinions
- Application of Robert B. KeeganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014