Legal Opinion

Hardinge Bros. v. Marr Oil Heat Mach. Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 6, 1928No. 3987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAGE, Circuit Judge.

The District Court (20 F.[2d] 241) held claims 1, 2, 5, and 101 of plaintiffs’ (appellees’) patent, No. 1,158,058, to King, for centrifugal oil burner, valid and infringed. The defenses were noninfringement and invalidity in view of the prior art.

*780The prior art dates back to Cook patent, No. 73,506, issued in 1868. The Klein patent, No. 473,759, issued in 1892, and Eddy, No. 540,650, issued in 1895, are also relied on. In those three patents, the main feature was a cone-shaped rotating oil distributor, on the end of a horizontal shaft, inserted into the Are box. Those…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Original Corp. v. Jenkins Food Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  2. Application of MillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  3. Clark v. Ace Rubber Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
  4. The American Original Corporation v. Jenkins Food CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API