Legal Opinion

State v. Mooers and Becker

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2017No. Case No. 20150996PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Himonas, opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 We address two underlying cases in this appeal, both of which turn on the same issue: whether an order of complete restitution that is part of a plea in abeyance is a final order appealable as of right. The Utah Court of Appeals determined in the first case, State v. Mooers, 2015 UT App 266 , 362 P.3d 282 , that it is not. In the second case, State v. Becker, 2015 UT App 304 , 365 P.3d 173 , another panel of the court of appeals held that it was bound by the Mooers panel's holding. Each panel dismissed its case for lack of jurisdiction,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Miller v. WeaverUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Encon Utah, LLC v. Fluor Ames Kraemer, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Kennecott Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Burton v. ChenUtah Supreme Court · 2023
  3. State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  4. State v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 2025
  5. State v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API