South Carolina Department of Social Services. v. Bacot
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Sanders, Chief Judge:
This is an action by respondents South Carolina Department of Social Services and Katie Lee Marlowe, the mother of a minor child, against appellant William Bacot, alleging him to be the child’s father. The family court judge admitted certain blood test results and expert testimony in determining Bacot to be the father. The parties stipulated the only questions on appeal are the admissibility of the blood test results and the supporting expert testimony. We affirm.
Dr. Emily G. Reisner testified she is the director of the HLA Laboratory of Duke Hospital Blood Bank. As such,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. NewtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Toole v. SalterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
- Prince v. Associated Petroleum CarriersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
- North Greenville College v. Sherman Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BeausoleilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Madden v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Crowley Ex Rel. Estate of Crowley v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Kofford Ex Rel. Utah State Department of Social Services v. FloraUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Bonaparte v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.