Legal Opinion
Burmeister v. Saldich
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 18, 2023No. 4:22-cv-00088Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHAD BURMEISTER, Case No. 22-cv-00088-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 18 10 ALAN SALDICH, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike, or in the alternative, to dismiss. See Dkt. 14 No. 18 (“Mot.”). The Court previously found this matter appropriate for disposition without oral 15 argument and took the motion under submission. See Dkt. No. 29; Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court 16 GRANTS the motion to strike for the reasons below. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 This…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.