Legal Opinion
Harvester, Inc. v. Rule Joy Trammell + Rubio, LLC
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 3, 2010No. Civil Action 3:09cv358PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Denying Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment)
HENRY E. HUDSON, District Judge.
This is an action brought under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101, ei seq. Plaintiff, Commonwealth Architects (“Commonwealth”), alleges that Defendant, Rule Joy Trammell + Rubio, LLC (“Rule Joy”), infringed its copyright held in a set of several architectural drawings. The matter is before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment by Rule Joy. Both parties submitted initial memoranda, and, pursuant to the Court’s Order of March 5, 2010, additional memoranda in support of their respective…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dream Custom Homes, Inc. v. Modern Day Construction, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
- Charles W. Ross Builder, Inc. v. Olsen Fine Home Building, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Building Graphics, Inc. v. Lennar Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Home Design Services, Inc. v. Starwood Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- Charles W. Ross Builder, Inc. v. Olsen Fine Home Building, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.