Home Design Services, Inc. v. Starwood Construction, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE
MILLER, District Judge.
This matter is before me on Plaintiffs Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 61) and Motion to Strike, in Part, Defendants’ Summary Judgment Evidence (ECF No. 108). Defendants oppose both motions. I have reviewed the parties’ written arguments and conclude that oral argument is not required. For the reasons that follow, the motion for summary judgment will be granted in part and denied in part. The motion to strike will be denied without prejudice.
Background 1
Plaintiff is a residential design firm that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gene S. Jacobsen, and Cross-Appellee v. Deseret Book Company, a Utah Corporation Dean Hughes, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Ellison v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Building Graphics, Inc. v. Lennar Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Zalewski v. T.P. Builders, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Lane v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Niehues v. WhitemyerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
- Redmellon, L.L.C. v. HalumDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.