Legal Opinion

Rasener v. Atlantic Refining Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1935No. Appeals, 123 and 125Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

We agree with the learned judge of the court below, before whom this case was tried, that the questions of the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s contributory negligence were for the jury; and that the plaintiffs’ contributory negligence did not so clearly appear, from the evidence offered by them, as to require the court to declare it established as matter of law.

The statement of questions involved is limited to matters affecting only the defendant’s right to a directed verdict in its favor, and judgment non obstante veredicto. The assignments of error will be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zandras v. MoffettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Weiss v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Amey v. ErbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Hatch v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Smith Et Ux v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API