Legal Opinion

Smith Et Ux v. Gross

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1934No. Appeal 262PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, were riding as guests in an automobile owned and driven by defendant when an accident occurred and the plantiff wife was injured. At the close of plaintiffs’ case a compulsory nonsuit was granted which the court subsequently refused to remove.

There are but two questions involved, and we are all of the opinion that both should be answered in favor of the appellant. Did the plaintiffs make out a case which entitled them to go to a jury? Did the court err in striking from the record certain evidence given by the plaintiffs?

A compulsory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. SolskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Hatch v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Bernstein v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Banks v. Shoemaker & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Vespe v. RosenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mulheirn v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Chadwick v. PopadickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Wertz v. ShadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Kowtko v. Delaware and Hudson Railroad Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Murphy v. NeelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API