Legal Opinion
Hudson v. EI DuPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided May 27, 1968PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’HORA, Judge.
This is an appeal from the findings and award of the Industrial Accident Board (“the Board”). The facts are complicated, and by necessity must be set out at some length.
In 1959, Harry C. Hudson (“the claimant”) was hired by E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Company (“DuPont”) as a carpenter. In 1961, the claimant fell on the icy steps of his home and was treated for back injury, an injury which was not a compensable injury under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
From the time of the 1961 fall until October 9, 1964, the claimant experienced no trouble with his back that prevented him…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- General Motors Corporation v. McNemarSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Fiorucci v. C. F. Braun & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1961
- General Motors Corporation v. HuesterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1968
- Craig v. SYNVAR CORPORATIONSuperior Court of Delaware · 1967
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Group v. BeelerDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1965
3Cited by8 opinions
- Milowicki v. Post and Paddock, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- AMOCO CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. HillSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
- Ellison v. City of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
- DeRocili v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- RHINEHARDT-MEREDITH v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.